[Dailydave] VPC

Andrew R. Reiter arr at watson.org
Sat Mar 1 14:59:18 EST 2008


hey,

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Matt Richard wrote:

[snip]
>
> I have only seen defensive implementations such as the work of
> Garfinkel and Rosenblum at Stanford.  Their use case is a modified
> hypervisor that can monitor critical OS data structures.  One of their
> implementations watches the Linux system call table and can prevent
> modification to thwart rootkits.
>
> http://www.cs.fit.edu/%7Epkc/id/related/garfinkel03ndssVM.pdf
>

Admittedly I just browsed this paper (so please forgive any poor 
assumptions I make), but it seems their sys call protection scheme just 
monitors the syscall table structure and not the actual syscall code.  My 
point being -- for a long time people have just done jmp overwrites at the 
beginning (or other known to be "ok" location) of the system call they are 
hooking so that they don't have to touch the values in the syscall table. 
Am I wrong about what they protect?  If so, my fault!! :D

Cheers,
Andrew


More information about the Dailydave mailing list