This is the type of certification that I like to see. A couple other
places have similar certs or at least philosophies. Jack Koziol and
HBGary's classes come to mind. <br>
<br>
I think the exams are fun and generally worth it. But I'm still not
sure of the "cert" part. Essentially the cert boils down to writing an
exploit. Couldn't you just say that and/or point to existing work? I
think the fact that the cert would say Immunity and/or Dave Aitel would
go along way in the right crowds -- though those crowds are typically
small enough that if you're serious about the job people at least
already know your name.<br> regarding disclosure, but I find the difficulties tremendous. Who owns the exploit my c
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/10/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Dave Aitel</b> <<a href="mailto:dave@immunityinc.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">dave@immunityinc.com
</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>Hash: SHA1<br><br>One thing we've been working on here at Immunity are Network Offense<br>Professional certifications. Essentially it would be practical tests<br>that established someone was capable of doing certain actions we
<br>should all be able to do.<br><br>For example, the first certification was a simple stack overflow<br>against Windows 2000. Testee's would exploit it using Immunity<br>Debugger/WinDBG and VisualSploit, which would keep it as technology
<br>agnostic as possible. You can either write a simple Win32 overflow or<br>you can't.<br><br>We were going to launch it during DefCon, but had a few other things<br>going on. :><br><br>- -dave<br><br><br>J.M. Seitz wrote:
<br>> Hey Mike,<br>><br>>> The CISSP is the undisputed king of information security<br>>> certifications. Currently, every now and then a security company<br>>> starts pushing their employees towards certification programs.
<br>>> These are usually known for featuring insanely long exams,<br>>> absurdly pedantic requirements and other kinds of doubtfully<br>>> respectable necessities.<br>><br>> I wouldn't say it's the king, I would say it has some very broad
<br>> objectives, but is moreso a Security+ on steroids. When the CISSP<br>> got traction, you have to look at the timing of the certification,<br>> and the fact that the only other certification that would get you a
<br>> high paying job was a CCIE, and the CCIE is a nasty cert to get to<br>> say the least. SANS has put out some incredibly strong programs<br>> that can range from technical (GCIH/GCFA/GREM) to CISSP-like<br>
> certifications.
<br>><br>><br>>> We all know that there are several other certifications, but<br>>> CISSP brings, without doubt, the very best. Be it a security<br>>> operations manager, a field operative or some other kind of
<br>>> consulting freak, a CISSP will always deliver.<br>><br>> I still disagree, and to be honest, I have interviewed more CISSP's<br>> that couldn't answer questions like "What does PKI stand for?",
<br>> "Give me an analogy of a buffer overflow.","What is transparent<br>> proxying and why is it important in some circumstances?". Come on,<br>> certs are as good as the people who take them, I again disagree.
<br>><br>><br>>> My question for people out there, is this madness _that_<br>>> necessary? Do we have a good reason for spending loads of budget<br>>> on certification programs and wasting our companies' money in
<br>>> such investments?<br>><br>> Yep, again it's a baseline, one for HR. The people to watch out for<br>> are the ones who go the extra mile, some who has a GCIH most<br>> definitely doesn't make me giggle with glee, but someone who has a
<br>> GCIH Gold I look forward to meeting with, and definitely love to<br>> engage on their research topic. It's worth a company's time and<br>> money to do it (a) employees are more loyal to companies that give
<br>> (b) you'd be amazed at how often you will apply things straight<br>> from a certification.<br>><br>>> Employees feel constrained since they might lose the<br>>> certification after quitting their jobs, surfing towards another
<br>>> employer as intrusive and wasteful as the previous one, etc.<br>><br>> Not sure how you would lose a certification if you left your job?<br>> Once you write the exam, it's yours not your company's.
<br>><br>>> If certifications exist for ethical hackers, are we going to see<br>>> certifications for unethical hackers anytime soon? What if the<br>>> mob and shady underground organizations needed to certify that
<br>>> they are employing the very best of the federal prison's Module<br>>> 5? Will a Certified Unethical Software Security Expert (CUSSE)<br>>> certification ever exist? "My name is Lincoln Six Echo, Certified
<br>>> Information Insecurity Systems Professional".<br>><br>> <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/08/a-look-inside-a.html" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/08/a-look-inside-a.html</a><br>
><br>> There ya go :) I bet one or two unscrupulous people are<br>> "black-belts" :)<br>><br>> In the end, certifications are good, but the reality is that they<br>> are only good if you are looking for work, and you get what you put
<br>> into them. You want to get noticed in the security world? Build a<br>> tool, join and help people on forums, help Sourcefire write<br>> signatures (they need it), contact George Theall at Tenable and ask<br>
> if you can help write NASL plugins, help the OSVDB with mangling.<br>> These are all things that will help round out a newcomer, and add<br>> it to the list of things that can benefit you when its time to go<br>
> job hunting. Now, if you _really_ want to get noticed, tackle the<br>> tough problems, write books, and try to talk at Black Hat, etc.<br>><br>> Coming from an unknown security guy, low profile, I am still in the
<br>> phase of doing all of these things. As such I have a Sec+ and a<br>> GCIH (which I am wrapping up my research paper on), and I can<br>> honestly say I do use some of it in my day-to-day. You don't see<br>
> these acronyms on my email signature but that's because I am not<br>> looking for work :)<br>><br>> JS<br>><br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing<br>
> list <a href="mailto:Dailydave@lists.immunitysec.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">Dailydave@lists.immunitysec.com</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
</a><br><br>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)<br><br>iD8DBQFG5Uq/B8JNm+PA+iURAl+CAKDAkJkhJvSNf+lIAtF55A6IotizfgCgtZiP<br>od5Gzue0h/Q6P4MTq5E7/pM=<br>=VXSu<br>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>Dailydave mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Dailydave@lists.immunitysec.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">Dailydave@lists.immunitysec.com
</a><br><a href="http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Matthew Wollenweber<br><a href="mailto:mwollenweber@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
mwollenweber@gmail.com</a> | <a href="mailto:mjw@cyberwart.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
mjw@cyberwart.com</a><br><a href="http://www.cyberwart.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">www.cyberwart.com</a>